Quote:
Overall, whenever the focus doesn't need to be on the "Medieval" aspect (like Terenas's torturers, brutal barbarian societies, Gilnean and Lordaeronian feudal system and peasantry), fantasy merely plays out to morals and ideas that are relatable to the viewer.
|
Which is exactly why it is not medieval Kir.
There are just too many instances that are distinctly non-medieval.
Humans not killing orcs en masse after the Second War. Not even blinding them which would have been merciful by medieval standards.
Then you have this great freedom everyone seems to show, no one appears to be an out and out slave or even wage slave. And when such things happen they are isolated, condemned events. There is no true feudalism or slavery to be found!
The ability to travel quickly, a developed global mail system... Concerns over more than just food, like when A&H war over oil and such. And when we mention that what about sending armies all over the world with ease? I do not see medieval societies being able to do such stunts.
Which also reminds me how most people of Azeroth have developed nationalistic sentiments, another fairly modern ideology. Seems just about every human is willing to fight to the death rather than acknowledge any form of Horde domination. People of the medieval were much more fluid in that regard and you'd expect some commoners to bow down to the Horde or other enemies that might conquer them.
The examples go on and on. The truth is that you can't inject so many modern views and concepts without making it a modern setting masquerading as a medieval one.
I do not think anyone here is saying this is a purely modern setting, since such distinctions are unsubstantial in a fantasy setting, but it is far removed from a medieval setting as well.